MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315441568 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-4428

Autonomous Robotic Capture of Non-cooperative Target by Vision-based Kinematic Control

2015· article· en· W2315441568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRobot visionRobotControl (management)Robot kinematicsMotion captureMobile robotMotion (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper developed a vision-based kinematic controller for robotic manipulators to perform autonomous capture of non-cooperative target. In order to accurately estimate the kinestate of the target, a combination approach of photogrammetry and extended Kalman filter was adopted. Due to the non-cooperative nature of the target as well as the uncertainty of the interception time, it is challenging to determine the interception point between trajectories of the target and the end-effector in a priori. Therefore, an incremental kinematic controller is proposed for the robotic manipulator. Validating simulation results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it