MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315532451 · doi:10.2514/6.2006-6930

Optimal Design for Uncertain Load Cases Using Convex Hulls

2006· article· en· W2315532451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHullConvex hullComputer scienceRegular polygonMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineeringMarine engineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optimal design of a structure subjected to uncertain loads is considered. Convex modeling, a deterministic approach for optimal design of a structure subjected to uncertain load cases, is used. Two approaches to design are considered. First, each load is assumed to vary continuously between a lower and upper limit and an optimal design is obtained. Second, discrete load cases lying between the limits are identied and the structure is designed for all possible cases. It is found that in the rst approach, the structure is over-designed as compared to the second approach. Constraints such as stress and deection, which are explicitly dependent on loads, are used. The number of such constraints multiplies with an increase in the number of discrete load cases. Computational expense and optimizer convergence problems increase signican tly with an increasing number of constraints. A convex hull approach is used to reduce the number of discrete load cases in order to reduce computational expense and to reduce convergence problems. A ten-bar truss is used to demonstrate the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it