MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling and Optimization of the Upgrading and Blending Operations of Oil Sands Bitumen

2016· article· en· W2315812672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsAsphaltOil sandsProcess (computing)Process optimizationProduction (economics)Process engineeringFunction (biology)Computer sciencePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general framework is proposed for the operation optimization of a bitumen upgrading plant in the oil sands industry. On the basis of simulation results from an upgrading plant in an Aspen HYSYS environment, empirical models are developed through statistical analysis for different process units. Each generated correlation is a function of the relevant process unit operating conditions. All of the correlations are further used to develop the upgrading plant optimization model, which is a non-convex nonlinear optimization (NLP) problem. The proposed model is tested on three examples in which different commodity demands are imposed as constraints: (i) no restriction for production, (ii) sweet synthetic crude oil (SCO) production, and (iii) mandatory multiple production. Results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework for the upgrading plant operation optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it