MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316059657 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.184105

Molecular origins of nonlinear optical activity in zinc tris(thiourea)sulfate revealed by high-resolution x-ray diffraction data and<i>ab initio</i>calculations

2013· article· en· W2316059657 on OpenAlexafffund
Jacqueline M. Cole, Daniel D. Hickstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsPolarizabilityAb initioDiffractionWave functionDipoleCrystallographyMoleculeAtomic physicsMolecular physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structure-property relationships are established in the nonlinear optical (NLO) material, zinc tris(thiourea)sulfate (ZTS), via an experimental charge-density study, x-ray constrained wave-function refinement, and quantum-mechanical calculations. The molecular charge-transfer characteristics of ZTS, that are important for NLO activity, are topologically analyzed via a multipolar refinement of high-resolution x-ray diffraction data, which is supported by neutron diffraction measurements. The extent to which each chemical bond is ionic or covalent in nature is categorized by Laplacian-based bonding classifiers of the electron density; these include bond ellipticities, energy densities, and the local source function. Correspondingly, the NLO origins of ZTS are judged to best resemble those of organic NLO materials. The molecular dipole moment, ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathbf{i}}$, and (hyper)polarizability coefficients, ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\alpha}}}_{\mathbf{ij}}$ and ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{ijk}}$, are calculated from the experimental diffraction data using the x-ray constrained wave-function method. Complementary gas-phase ab initio quantum-mechanical calculations of ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathbf{i}}$, ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\alpha}}}_{\mathbf{ij}}$, and ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{ijk}}$ offer a supporting comparison. When taken alone, the experimental charge-density analysis does not fare well in deriving ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathbf{i}}$, ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\alpha}}}_{\mathbf{ij}}$, or ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{ijk}}$, which is not entirely surprising given that the associated calculations are only generally valid for organic molecules. However, by refining the x-ray data within the constrained wave-function method, the evaluations of ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathbf{i}}$, ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\alpha}}}_{\mathbf{ij}}$, and ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{ijk}}$ are shown to agree very well with those from ab initio calculations and show remarkable normalization to experimental refractive index measurements. The small differences observed between ab initio and x-ray constrained wave-function refinement results can be related directly to gas- versus solid-state phase differences. ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathbf{i}}$ is found to be 28.3 Debye (gas phase) and 29.7 Debye (solid state) while ${\mathbit{\ensuremath{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{ijk}}$ coefficients are not only significant but are also markedly three dimensional in form. Accordingly, substantial octupolar as well as dipolar NLO contributions in ZTS are indicated, which challenges the traditional focus on dipolar NLO molecules. This evaluation of NLO properties and their relation to the molecular structure offers several ways by which ZTS may be more widely functionalized as a NLO material. More generally, this case study on ZTS demonstrates how experimental and computational techniques can be combined to understand NLO structure-property relationships, an important tool for the quantum-tailored molecular design of next-generation metalorganic NLO materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207