MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316616656 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000306

Atrioventricular Disruption After Mitral Valve Replacement

2014· article· en· W2316616656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionMitral valve replacementMitral valve repairMitral regurgitationCardiopulmonary bypassTransesophageal echocardiogramMitral valveHeart failureTricuspid valveSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 81-year-old man with coronary artery disease and severe mitral regurgitation from myxomatous mitral valve disease was referred for surgery due to progressive congestive heart failure. He was scheduled to have mitral valve replacement (MVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting. His intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) revealed that the main mechanism of his mitral regurgitation was anterior leaflet prolapse. He had severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction 25%). There was right ventricular and tricuspid annular dilation with mild-to-moderate tricuspid regurgitation, but right ventricular function was preserved. After completion of the MVR (29 mm Hancock II, Medtronic, Mississauga, Canada) and coronary artery bypass grafting (4 grafts), the patient was weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with inotropic support. Immediate post-CPB TEE revealed paravalvular leak, a small hematoma in the interatrial septum (IAS) and global LV hypokinesia (ejection fraction 10%–20%) (Fig. 1; Video 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/AA/A917). The initial diagnosis was myocardial ischemia due to coronary air. The surgeon decided to decannulate the aorta, and protamine was administered. The patient became more hypotensive, despite increasing inotropic requirements. The TEE showed worsening biventricular function, subtle rocking of the bioprosthetic MVR, and hematoma in the IAS (Fig. 2; Video 2, Supplemental Digital Content 2, https://links.lww.com/AA/A918). The patient remained hypotensive, and CPB was reinstituted for surgical exploration. A large hematoma was found in the posterior atrioventricular groove extending to the inferior vena cava. The surgeon attempted but failed to repair the disrupted atrioventricular groove, and the patient died on the operating table. Retrospective analysis of the intraoperative 3-D TEE imaging using Qlab software (Philips Medical Systems) revealed a crescentic gap around the posterior aspect of the MVR, consistent with atrioventricular separation (Fig. 3; Video 3, Supplemental Digital Content 3, https://links.lww.com/AA/A919). With the use of multiple 2D planes (MPR mode) reconstructed from a 3D data set, the extent of atrioventricular separation was more readily appreciated (Fig. 3).Figure 1: Midesophageal 4-chamber, zoomed view of the prosthetic mitral valve. Color Doppler demonstrates 2 paravalvular jets. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; MVR = prosthetic mitral valve; PV leak = paravalvular leak; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass.Figure 2: Time series of transesophageal echocardiographic images demonstrating the growth of the intramural hematoma. A, Midesophageal 4-chamber view demonstrates some thickening of the IAS 7 minutes after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. B, After 17 minutes, the interatrial hematoma has increased in size. In this image, separation of the prosthetic mitral annulus from the septum can be seen. C, Midesophageal short-axis view, after 33 minutes, the interatrial hematoma has extended into the aortic root. D, Three-dimensional echocardiographic image of the prosthetic mitral valve, with separation between the prosthetic valve annulus and the LV. IAS = interatrial septum; LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle; AV = aortic valve.Figure 3: Multiplanar analysis of a 3D data set, with 3 orthogonal planes (red, green, blue). Two cut planes (green, red) demonstrate the prosthetic mitral valve in long-axis. In the en face view (blue plane), the gap between the mitral valve and the left ventricle (white dashed line) can be measured. MVR = prosthetic mitral valve.Atrioventricular disruption is a rare but fatal complication after MVR, with a reported incidence between 0.5% and 14% and mortality between 50% and 75%.1,2 Classification has been divided into 3 types based on the location of the tear. Type I is the most common type and is associated with MVR. Types II and III have been virtually abolished, primarily due to the introduction of surgical preservation techniques and low-profile mitral prostheses (Table 1).Table 1: Types of Left Ventricular (LV) Rupture After Mitral Valve Replacement8The main clinical presentation for atrioventricular disruption is either unstable hemodynamics after weaning from CPB or failure to wean from CPB. Frank rupture with massive bleeding from the LV can alert the clinicians to the diagnosis of LV rupture. However, LV failure and ventricular arrhythmias are usually nonspecific presentations in many cases. More specific signs, such as dissecting hematoma in the posterior atrioventricular groove, are often not appreciated by the surgeon from the anterior operating view. Therefore, TEE diagnosis is important to provide an earlier diagnosis, allowing immediate surgical intervention. Echocardiographic features of late or delayed LV rupture with pseudoaneurysm have been well reported,3,4 but intraoperative TEE features of early LV type 1 rupture after MVR have not yet been described. We found that the initial 2D echocardiographic features were very subtle. The most striking features in our patient were worsening of biventricular failure and rocking of the bioprosthetic MVR. The small IAS hematoma in the initial images after separation from CPB is atypical after MVR and should prompt further evaluation. The differential should always include the possibility of atrioventricular separation.5 There was a subtle rocking motion of the bioprosthetic MVR on immediate post-CPB images, but both the degree of rocking and the size of hematoma progressed with the worsening of the atrioventricular separation, clarifying the diagnosis. The distinction among MVR dehiscence, paravalvular leak, and atrioventricular disruption may be difficult by 2D TEE alone but has both management and prognostic implications. Left atrial (LA) dissection may be associated with LV rupture5,6 and typically appears as a hypoechoic space from the mitral origin extending along the IAS or LA wall. The presence of systolic collapsing and demonstration of communicating flow across the false cavity are the hallmarks of LA dissection.7 Three-dimensional TEE has the advantage of better delineation of the extent of the atrioventricular separation. Our 3D image demonstrated the presence of a large crescentic gap between the prosthetic valve annulus and the LV, which was larger than appreciated on the 2D images. When we used multiplanar analysis, we were able to deconstruct the 3D data set to obtain an en face cut plane image of the entire prosthetic mitral valve annulus where it was not attached to the LV. With this unique plane, we can truly appreciate the extensive nature and size of the disruption. Given the clinical scenario, the almost circumferential gap was not consistent with a residual paravalvular leak but atrioventricular disruption. Beyond the qualitative assessment, this cut plane through the 3D data set also allowed us to quantitate the size. This would have been important if any annular reconstruction techniques are considered in an attempt to correct the situation. In summary, atrioventricular disruption is an uncommon but often fatal complication of MVR and prompt diagnosis is crucial. Initial echocardiographic features, including LV failure, IAS hematoma, paravalvular leak, and rocking motion of the MVR, can be subtle and nonspecific. Three-dimensional echocardiographic examination may be helpful for a more accurate and earlier diagnosis. Clinician’s Key Teaching Points By Kent H. Rehfeldt, MD, Roman M. Sniecinski, MD, and Martin J. London, MD Atrioventricular disruption is a rare but often fatal complication of mitral valve replacement resulting from excessive debridement of annular calcification, placement of annular sutures partially within the posterior left ventricular wall, or lifting the heart in a manner that uses the atrioventricular groove as a fulcrum. Although the initial transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) findings may be nonspecific, it can help distinguish atrioventricular disruption from other complications of mitral replacement such as paravalvular leak or left atrial dissection. Isolated paravalvular regurgitation typically presents without adjacent hematoma. Left atrial dissection is characterized by an echolucent space within the atrial septum or lateral atrial wall that may demonstrate blood flow on Doppler imaging or systolic collapse of the space. In this case, besides identifying paravalvular regurgitation, TEE demonstrated an enlarging hematoma of the atrial septum and an increasing degree of prosthesis rocking indicative of partial separation of the sewing ring from the annulus. In addition, a progressive decline in biventricular systolic dysfunction was observed. Three-dimensional TEE may offer advantages over 2D imaging in the recognition of atrioventricular disruption. In particular, an en face view of the mitral prosthesis may demonstrate extensive separation of the sewing ring away from the annulus, distinguishing this condition from an isolated paravalvular leak. DISCLOSURES Name: Jason Chui, MB ChB. Contribution: This author helped conduct the study and write the manuscript. Attestation: Jason Chui approved the final manuscript. Name: Andrew Roscoe, MB ChB. Contribution: This author helped conduct the study and write the manuscript. Attestation: Andrew Roscoe approved the final manuscript. Name: Wendy Tsang, MD, SM. Contribution: This author helped conduct the study and write the manuscript. Attestation: Wendy Tsang approved the final manuscript. This manuscript was handled by: Martin J. London, MD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it