MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316805689 · doi:10.4156/jdcta.vol5.issue4.19

UAV Pose Estimation using POSIT Algorithm

2011· article· en· W2316805689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEstimationPoseAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vision-based pose estimation is widely employed to Mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (MUAV) with limited payloads. The Pose from Orthography and Scaling and Iterations (POSIT) is one of the most important solutions to estimate the pose by 2-D images and 3-D model of objects. In order to evaluate the performance of POSIT algorithm, a test platform that consists of a MUAV, a wireless camera, a computer workstation, and a motion capture (Optitrack) system is developed. The pose of the MUAV is calculated by the POSIT algorithm with a set of 2-D images captured by the on-board camera, and the calculated pose is compared to the actual pose reading from the Optitrack system. The experimental result demonstrates that the error remains within acceptable bounds and the POSIT is a useful alternative for pose estimation of a MUAV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it