MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316855288 · doi:10.1255/jnirs.971

Investigating the Need for Modelling Temporal Dependencies in a Brain-Computer Interface with Real-Time Feedback Based on near Infrared Spectra

2012· article· en· W2316855288 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain–computer interfaceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)Pattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionHidden Markov modelPsychologyElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is an emerging non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) modality that measures changes in haemoglobin concentrations in neurocortical tissue. Previous NIR spectroscopy studies have not employed real-time feedback with online classification, a combination which would allow users to alter their mental strategy on the fly. In particular, it is unclear whether or not the temporal dependencies of haemodynamic changes ought to be considered in online classification. To answer this quest ion, this study contrasted online classification of prefrontal haemodynamics using NIR spectra processed using two approaches: an artificial neural network (ANN) that considered instantaneous samples of oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin concentrations (i.e. ignored temporal dependencies) and a hidden Markov model-based (HMM) classifier which modelled a temporal sequence of concentrations (i.e. embodied temporal dependencies). Both classifiers were implemented for online operation with immediate visual feedback via a monitor showing a vertical bar the height of which was contingent on the classifier's output. Ten subjects participated in two study sessions each, one with each type of classifier. Participants were cued to raise and lower the bar in alternating 20s intervals using mental fast singing and focused breathing, respectively. Only the ANN classifier facilitated online classification rates greater than chance ( P = 0.0289). The influence of physiological noise on online classification of prefrontal haemodynamics was deemed to be minimal via offline analysis of concurrently measured respiration and blood pulse. Nine of the ten participants reported using the feedback to alter their activation strategy. Mental fatigue, task repetitiveness and the lack of ambient lighting were identified as factors compromising performance in half the participants. The inferior performance of the HMM classifiers suggests that modelling of the temporal dynamics of haemoglobin concentration changes may not be necessary in an online NIR-BCI. Further study of online NIR-BCIs with instantaneous feedback is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it