Investigating the Need for Modelling Temporal Dependencies in a Brain-Computer Interface with Real-Time Feedback Based on near Infrared Spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is an emerging non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) modality that measures changes in haemoglobin concentrations in neurocortical tissue. Previous NIR spectroscopy studies have not employed real-time feedback with online classification, a combination which would allow users to alter their mental strategy on the fly. In particular, it is unclear whether or not the temporal dependencies of haemodynamic changes ought to be considered in online classification. To answer this quest ion, this study contrasted online classification of prefrontal haemodynamics using NIR spectra processed using two approaches: an artificial neural network (ANN) that considered instantaneous samples of oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin concentrations (i.e. ignored temporal dependencies) and a hidden Markov model-based (HMM) classifier which modelled a temporal sequence of concentrations (i.e. embodied temporal dependencies). Both classifiers were implemented for online operation with immediate visual feedback via a monitor showing a vertical bar the height of which was contingent on the classifier's output. Ten subjects participated in two study sessions each, one with each type of classifier. Participants were cued to raise and lower the bar in alternating 20s intervals using mental fast singing and focused breathing, respectively. Only the ANN classifier facilitated online classification rates greater than chance ( P = 0.0289). The influence of physiological noise on online classification of prefrontal haemodynamics was deemed to be minimal via offline analysis of concurrently measured respiration and blood pulse. Nine of the ten participants reported using the feedback to alter their activation strategy. Mental fatigue, task repetitiveness and the lack of ambient lighting were identified as factors compromising performance in half the participants. The inferior performance of the HMM classifiers suggests that modelling of the temporal dynamics of haemoglobin concentration changes may not be necessary in an online NIR-BCI. Further study of online NIR-BCIs with instantaneous feedback is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".