MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317105492 · doi:10.2514/6.2007-6531

An Estimator for Processing UAV-Reconnaissance Data in Support of Urban Operations

2007· article· en· W2317105492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaptopEstimatorComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Fraction (chemistry)SimulationMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of small and micro UAVs for sensing purposes, combined with the complex structure of urban combat, has led to both an ability and a requirement to generate estimates of force distributions in an urban setting. Such force distributions are needed as inputs to other tools being developed as computational aids for C 2 . Although the UAVs can produce voluminous data, conversion of that data into meaningful information is not computationally feasible with standard machinery (i.e., tools that propagate probability distributions over the set of potential opponent force distributions). We discuss an alternative estimator which requires only a small fraction of the computational power of a laptop computer when operating on realistically-sized problems. The algorithm is developed, error bounds are obtained, and an example of the UAV observation-based estimator operating in conjunction with an urban combat C 2 simulator is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it