MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317622395 · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000974

Protein Expression Profiling Predicts Graft Performance in Clinical Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

2014· article· en· W2317622395 on OpenAlexafffund
Tiago Machuca, Marcelo Cypel, Jonathan Yeung, Riccardo Bonato, R. Zamel, Manyin Chen, S. Azad, Michael Hsin, Tomohito Saito, Zehong Guan, Thomas K. Waddell, Mingyao Liu, Shaf Keshavjee

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationLung transplantationEx vivoPerfusionLungArea under the curveInternal medicineSurgeryIn vivo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objectives: To study the impact of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) on cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors and their correlation with graft performance either during perfusion or after transplantation. Background: EVLP is a modern technique that preserves lungs on normothermia in a metabolically active state. The identification of biomarkers during clinical EVLP can contribute to the safe expansion of the donor pool. Methods: High-risk brain death donors and donors after cardiac death underwent 4 to 6 hours EVLP. Using a multiplex magnetic bead array assay, we evaluated analytes in perfusate samples collected at 1 hour and 4 hours of EVLP. Donor lungs were divided into 3 groups: (I) Control: bilateral transplantation with good early outcome [absence of primary graft dysfunction– (PGD) grade 3]; (II) PGD3: bilateral transplantation with PGD grade 3 anytime within 72 hours; (III) Declined: lungs unsuitable for transplantation after EVLP. Results: Of 50 cases included in this study, 27 were in Control group, 7 in PGD3, and 16 in Declined. From a total of 51 analytes, 34 were measurable in perfusates. The best marker to differentiate declined lungs from control lungs was stem cell growth factor -β [P < 0.001, AUC (area under the curve) = 0.86] at 1 hour. The best markers to differentiate PGD3 cases from controls were interleukin-8 (P < 0.001, AUC = 0.93) and growth-regulated oncogene-α (P = 0.001, AUC = 0.89) at 4 hours of EVLP. Conclusions: Perfusate protein expression during EVLP can differentiate lungs with good outcome from lungs PGD3 after transplantation. These perfusate biomarkers can be potentially used for more precise donor lung selection improving the outcomes of transplantation. This is the first study to examine protein expression in perfusates of high-risk donor lungs submitted to clinical ex vivo lung perfusion. Perfusate markers were capable of predicting graft function after implantation. Our findings have a strong potential for clinical translation toward improving donor lung selection and transplantation outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of SurgerySame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207