A Discrete Stress–Strength Interference Theory-Based Dynamic Supplier Selection Model for Maintenance Service Outsourcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintenance service outsourcing is a strategic driver for asset intensive industries pursuing the enhancement of supply chain performance. Maintenance service supplier selection plays a relevant role in this premise since its significant impact on equipment availability, and hence, on business success. To periodically review suppliers' performances and update the outsourcing contract, a discrete stress-strength interference (DSSI) theory-based dynamic supplier selection model is presented for maintenance service outsourcing process. Taken account of the influence of randomness and uncertainty, a novel and universal evaluation criterion, demand fulfillment level (DFL) is introduced based on the DSSI theory. DFL is relevant to two random variables, which are random user's service order quantity (stress) and random supplier's service fulfillment quantity (strength), and DFL is defined as the probability that the latter (strength) is larger than the former (stress). Based on DFL, the proposed model can help users outsource the corresponding maintenance service to the most suitable supplier (maximum supplier reliability) at different periods. The decision rule can be described as a dynamic 3-D diagram, according to which decision makers can periodically review suppliers' performances and update the outsourcing contract. A case study on maintenance service supplier selection problem for a steel company illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".