Energy absorption rate of composite tube as a function of stacking sequence using finite element method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Numerical investigations were performed on a series of laminated composites when subjected to dynamic loadings, in order to determine their energy absorption rate and dissipating energy during impact. The details of numerical modeling, contact analysis, material parameters, and failure criteria were explained and discussed. We aimed to determine the energy absorption rate of various quasi-isotropic lay-ups when subjected to the dynamic loadings, and found that energy dissipation rate varied depending on stacking sequence. In this investigation, we studied how the energy absorption rate and the peak impact load change as a result of changing stacking sequence, with all stacking sequences being quasi-isotropic. Using a constant impacting mass and varied impacting speeds, we found that stacking sequence can significantly control the energy transfer rate or energy absorption rate under dynamic load condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it