MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W231877010

"What Part of Bath Do You Think They Will Settle In?": Jane Austen's Use of Bath in Persuasion. (the Country and the City)

2001· article· en· W231877010 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keiko Parker

Bibliographic record

VenuePersuasions; The Jane Austen Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersuasionBoroughQuarter (Canadian coin)Point (geometry)SociologyHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyGeometryMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LOCATION IS EVERYTHING, they say the business world. Why does one side of the street attract more customers than the other, and why does a family choose one neighborhood when moving into a new town rather than another, or for that matter why does one choose a city to live over another--it seems shopkeepers and businessmen are not the only ones concerned with location. It is interesting this respect that Bath is the setting, part, of both Jane Austen's first novel, Northanger Abbey, and her last, Persuasion. This paper deals specifically with how Jane Austen used Bath Persuasion, how the topography of Bath relates to the characters, and how the location of various characters mirrors the society Austen portrays. We should first review briefly the growth process of eighteenth-century Bath. For many years after its establishment as a spa by the Romans the first century, Bath remained a walled, Medieval town, built at the low end of a slope stretching down to the River Avon which bends sharply at one point to give the city its eastern and southern boundaries. Map of Bath, 1717 Emma Austen-Leigh's Jane Austen and Bath (20) shows the North Gate, South Gate, West Gate and East Gate. From the West Gate to the South Gate the city is bounded by a quarter circle Borough Wall, whereas the rest of the city is bounded by straight walls on five sides. In this Medieval part of the city we find the ancient Bath Abbey, the Pump Room (built 1706), and the baths--the King's Bath, the Queen's Bath, the Cross Bath, and the I-lot Bath. Outside the Borough Walls there are a few rows of houses to the north and south of the city, but the rest of the area is forest or pasture land as indicated by tree-shaped signs the map. From this Medieval town Bath grew northward and uphill, and Maggie Lane Jane Austen's England (74) states that a thousand houses were built in the 1790s alone--rapid growth by any standard. It should be helpful to mention some of the major landmarks of Bath at this point. John Wood the elder, chief among the architects of modern Bath, designed the Queen Square which was finished 1735. (1) John Wood himself lived there, and he started to build The Circus 1754 but died only three months later. The work was continued by his son, John Wood the younger, who also built the new Upper Assembly Rooms from 1769 to 1771. These Rooms were obviously built to cater to people who now lived the newer and higher part of town and did not want to go down to the Assembly Rooms the old town. The Upper Rooms were naturally more modern and spacious, and reflected eighteenth-century elegance. Between the two wings of the Assembly Rooms is the famous Octagon Room, which plays an important part Persuasion. The Roya l Crescent was begun 1767 and completed 1775, the year of Jane Austen's birth. After tearing down an existing inn the old town, Union Street was laid 1807 to unite or connect Stall Street the old town with the new and fashionable Milsom Street, which forms the main north-south axis the newer part of town. What we should note here is that the Medieval walled town of Bath expanded northward and literally upward, as one must ascend a total of over 80 meters (nearly 270 feet) to reach the highest part of Bath. I wish to explore this essay this special topographical feature of Bath--that as one goes north one goes upward, that upward is not just physical but social, and that, Persuasion, a character, his social rank, and his location go hand hand with the topography of the city. The importance of where one locates oneself Bath is hinted at, first by Mrs. Allen Northanger Abbey. [General Tilney's] lodgings were taken the very day after he left them, Catherine. But no wonder; Milsom-street you know' (NA 238), and then by Henrietta and Louisa Musgrove: [1]f we do go [to Bath], we must be a good situation--none of your Queen-squares for us! …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0180.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersuasions; The Jane Austen JournalSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207