MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319061455 · doi:10.7227/ijeee.50.2.7

Incorporating FPAAs into Laboratory Exercises for Analogue Filter Design

2013· article· en· W2319061455 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Todd J. Freeborn, Brent Maundy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical Engineering Education · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsField-programmable analog arrayTroubleshootingComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Focus (optics)Analogue electronicsComputer hardwareElectronic circuitComputer engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringAnalog signalDigital signal processingAnalog multiplierOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field Programmable Analogue Arrays (FPAAs) provide an excellent opportunity to introduce reconfigurable hardware for analogue signal processing during electrical engineering undergraduate laboratories. This hardware allows for higher complexity designs during laboratory sessions and can reduce the troubleshooting and frustrations in realizing circuits with discrete components to clearly focus on course learning objectives. This paper discusses the FPAA laboratories introduced for a 4th year undergraduate course on analogue filter design at the University of Calgary as well as the authors' experiences and student feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Electrical Engineering EducationSame topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207