MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MEMORY CONFIDENCE AND FALSE MEMORIES IN SCHIZOPHRENIA

2002· article· en· W2319287669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory Processes and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanColumbia universityLibrary scienceUniversity hospitalPsychiatryPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicineFamily medicineHistorySociologyMedia studiesArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Germany; 3Department of Medicine and Research, Riverview Hospital, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada; 4Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Reprint requests should be sent to: Dr. Steffen Moritz, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hospital for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] This study was sponsored by a grant awarded to Dr. Moritz by the German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) as well as the Dr. Norma Calder Foundation, the Canadian Psychiatric Research Foundation and the Canadian Institutes of Mental Health Research (Dr. Todd Woodward). The authors thank Jennifer Whitman, Carrie Cuttler, Tonya Kragelj, and Ailin Wu for their help conducting and performing the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it