MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319292801 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2016.2535313

Stochastic Circuit Design and Performance Evaluation of Vector Quantization for Different Error Measures

2016· article· en· W2319292801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsBinary numberComputer scienceAlgorithmStochastic computingScalabilityVector quantizationData compressionNorm (philosophy)Integrated circuit designMathematicsComputationArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vector quantization (VQ) is a general data compression technique that has a scalable implementation complexity and potentially a high compression ratio. In this paper, a novel implementation of VQ using stochastic circuits is proposed and its performance is evaluated against conventional binary designs. The stochastic and binary designs are compared for the same compression quality, and the circuits are synthesized for an industrial 28-nm cell library. The effects of varying the sequence length of the stochastic representation are studied with respect to throughput per area (TPA) and energy per operation (EPO). The stochastic implementations are shown to have higher EPOs than the conventional binary implementations due to longer latencies. When a shorter encoding sequence with 512 bits is used to obtain a lower quality compression measured by the L <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> -norm, squared L <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> -norm, and third-law errors, the TPA ranges from 1.16 to 2.56 times than that of the binary implementation with the same compression quality. Thus, although the stochastic implementation underperforms for a high compression quality, it outperforms the conventional binary design in terms of TPA for a reduced compression quality. By exploiting the progressive precision feature of a stochastic circuit, a readily scalable processing quality can be attained by halting the computation after different numbers of clock cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it