Stochastic Circuit Design and Performance Evaluation of Vector Quantization for Different Error Measures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vector quantization (VQ) is a general data compression technique that has a scalable implementation complexity and potentially a high compression ratio. In this paper, a novel implementation of VQ using stochastic circuits is proposed and its performance is evaluated against conventional binary designs. The stochastic and binary designs are compared for the same compression quality, and the circuits are synthesized for an industrial 28-nm cell library. The effects of varying the sequence length of the stochastic representation are studied with respect to throughput per area (TPA) and energy per operation (EPO). The stochastic implementations are shown to have higher EPOs than the conventional binary implementations due to longer latencies. When a shorter encoding sequence with 512 bits is used to obtain a lower quality compression measured by the L1-norm, squared L2-norm, and third-law errors, the TPA ranges from 1.16 to 2.56 times than that of the binary implementation with the same compression quality. Thus, although the stochastic implementation underperforms for a high compression quality, it outperforms the conventional binary design in terms of TPA for a reduced compression quality. By exploiting the progressive precision feature of a stochastic circuit, a readily scalable processing quality can be attained by halting the computation after different numbers of clock cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".