MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319510619 · doi:10.1021/ef501020d

A Novel Solid–Liquid Equilibrium Model for Describing the Adsorption of Associating Asphaltene Molecules onto Solid Surfaces Based on the “Chemical Theory”

2014· article· en· W2319510619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)
KeywordsAsphalteneAdsorptionThermodynamicsChemistryWettingArrhenius equationColloidPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryActivation energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltenes exhibit an amphiphlic behavior and tend to form colloidal i -mers, because of their chemical structure. The formation of colloidal aggregates can generate formation damage for the precipitation and/or deposition of asphaltenes, because of the degree of self-association, altering the wettability of rock surface and significantly affect crude oil viscosity and specific gravity. This study aims at introducing a novel model for describing, at the macroscopic level, the adsorption equilibria of self-associating molecules such as asphaltenes in solution onto solid surfaces based on the “chemical theory”. The model describes the adsorption isotherms temperature-dependent using three parameters, namely, maximum amount adsorbed, constant of i -mer reactions, and Henry’s law constant. Furthermore, a temperature-independent model of five parameters, based on the modifications of the constants of reaction and Henry’s law using an Arrhenius-type equation was proposed for estimating the thermodynamics parameters, such as Δ G ads °, Δ H ads °, and Δ S ads ° of the adsorption process. This model improves the understanding of interactions asphaltene–asphaltene and asphaltene–solid surface on the adsorption–equilibrium process. The theoretical predictions of isotherms were validated successfully by determining the root mean-square errors (RSM%) between data obtained from published literature and values predicted for asphaltenes and surfaces with differing chemical natures. More than 40 experimental data taken from literature have been used for validating the solid–liquid equilibrium (SLE) model for describing the adsorption isotherm of asphaltenes from different origins on surfaces with different chemical nature, which shows the model robustness due to the complexity of the liquid phase adsorption for those complex molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it