KINETICS OF CADMIUM RELEASE FROM SELECTED TROPICAL SOILS FROM KENYA BY LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT ORGANIC ACIDS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) commonly present in root exudates may influence the mobility and bioavailability of Cd in soils through the formation of soluble Cd-organic complexes in the soil rhizosphere. However, little is known about the dynamics of Cd released by LMWOAs from highly weathered tropical soils where large amounts of phosphate fertilizers are applied to correct phosphorus deficiency. Cadmium is a contaminant of phosphate fertilizers. The release of Cd from selected tropical soils treated with the Idaho monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer or the Cd perchlorate-added MAP chemical reagent by LMWOAs (10−3Mand 10−2M) was investigated at 25°C and at an ionic strength of 0.1MNaNO3 solution. The LMWOAs used in this study were acetic, citric, fumaric, malic, oxalic, and succinic acids. The surface soils used in this study were obtained from main agricultural areas in Kenya varying widely in physicochemical properties. The amounts of Cd released from the natural and the treated soils varied with the soils, the treatments, and the nature of the LMWOA. The amount of Cd released from the soils in the presence of LMWOAs also increased with the log stability constant values of the Cd-LMWOA complexes, indicating that Cd was brought into solution by LMWOAs as Cd-LMWOA complexes. A parabolic diffusion equation provided the best fit to the Cd released by LMWOAs during the short reaction period of 0.25 to 1 h. The overall diffusion coefficient values of the Cd released from the natural soils and the treated soils by LMWOAs varied with the soil type and the nature of the LMWOAs. The results showed that the LMWOAs enhanced the rate of Cd released from the soils, especially in the monoammonium phosphate-treated soils. The continuous release of Cd from the soils by renewal of LMWOAs indicates the sustaining power of the soils to replenish the Cd labile pool of the soils. The results also indicate that LMWOAs commonly present in the root exudates play a vital role in the mobilization of Cd in tropical soils and, hence, may influence its uptake by the plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".