Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During their 6 week international fieldwork placement at the Australasian Occupational Science Centre in Nowra, New South Wales, Australia, Victoria Valente and Katie Anderson, final year Masters in Occupational Therapy students at the University of Western Ontario spent time with the Dolphins, a local community‐based, occupation‐focused program. While attending one of the early morning sessions at the seaside swimming pool, the students observed and interviewed Dolphin members to explore why they participated daily and to understand how their participation in the club meets some of their occupational needs. The following essay, with comments from Dolphin members and illustrated with photos taken during the students’ visit, supports Doble and Santha's (2008) contention that individuals are more likely to experience well‐being when they choose to engage in occupations and orchestrate their lives to consistently meet their occupational needs. The students’ visit with the Dolphins reinforced for them the importance of people having opportunities and choices to participate in community‐based, occupation‐focused programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it