MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321555872 · doi:10.1021/ef502699c

Fickian and Non-Fickian Diffusion in Heavy Oil + Light Hydrocarbon Mixtures

2015· article· en· W2321555872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDiffusion Coefficients in Liquids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVirtual Materials GroupConocoPhillipsShell
KeywordsTolueneHydrocarbonChemistryDiffusionLight crude oilMass fractionHydrocarbon mixturesAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fraction (chemistry)Fick's laws of diffusionAsphaltMolecular diffusionAsphalteneMass transferThermodynamicsMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryChromatographyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffusive mass transfer is expected to play a key role in existing and proposed solvent-added processes for heavy oil production. Composition–distance profiles arising during free diffusion scale as a function of the joint variable (distance/time^ n w ). Simple fluids are governed by Fickian diffusion, where n w = 0.5. For nanostructured fluids, the value of n w can be as low as n w = 0.25, known as the single-file limit, but more typically, the value for the exponent falls between these two limits and is composition-dependent. In this work, five published data sets, comprising free diffusion composition profiles for Athabasca bitumen fractions and for Cold Lake bitumen + light hydrocarbons obtained using diverse apparatus, are probed from this perspective. Additional experimental results are provided for Athabasca bitumen + toluene mixtures over the temperature range of 273–313 K, and results from positive and negative control experiments for two well-defined mixtures—(0.25 mass fraction carbon nanotubes + polybutene) + toluene, and polybutene + toluene—are also provided. The value of n w for the negative control experiment remains at 0.50 ± 0.05 over the entire composition range, and for the positive control experiment, the value drops to n w = 0.30 ± 0.02 at low toluene mass fraction. Although the quality of the diffusion profile data in the data sets analyzed is variable, the values of the exponent n w are shown to be light-hydrocarbon-dependent and increase from n w ∼ 0.25 at low light-hydrocarbon mass fraction up to n w ∼ 0.50 at high light-hydrocarbon mass fraction. Secondary convective effects are also noted in free diffusion experiment outcomes at long times. The industrial applications of these findings are currently being evaluated, but it is clear that the time for light hydrocarbons to penetrate a fixed distance into nano- and micro-structured hydrocarbon resources is greater than the value anticipated for unstructured fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it