MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321640315 · doi:10.5172/mra.455.1.1.39

Meanings of the heart among a group of older Sikh immigrant women with cardiovascular disease

2007· article· en· W2321640315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistressEmotional distressDiseaseProject commissioningHeart diseaseMeaning (existential)PsychologyImmigrationMedicinePublishingPsychiatryClinical psychologyAnxietyInternal medicinePsychotherapistHistoryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we attempt to document the meaning of the heart to Sikh women suffering from cardiovascular disease. Analyzing transcripts from open-ended semi-structured interviews, we look for themes associated with both depictions of the heart in Sikh scripture and prior anthropological studies on heart distress in other cultures. Findings from our analysis are comparable to anthropological studies of heart distress in women from other cultures, with the common strain being that women understand their domestic role obligations as a source of emotional stress that can cause heart distress. Depictions of the heart in Sikh scripture differ from our participants’ experiences, though both emphasize internality and unity. The notions of internality and unity in Sikh scripture are connected with a healthy heart, but in the lives of our participants, internality and unity are a form of emotional duress that plays a role in heart distress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it