Unique Bonding Properties of the Au<sub>36</sub>(SR)<sub>24</sub> Nanocluster with FCC-Like Core
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent discovery on the total structure of Au36(SR)24, which was converted from biicosahedral Au38(SR)24, represents a surprising finding of a face-centered cubic (FCC)-like core structure in small gold-thiolate nanoclusters. Prior to this finding, the FCC feature was only expected for larger (nano)crystalline gold. Herein, we report results on the unique bonding properties of Au36(SR)24 that are associated with its FCC-like core structure. Temperature-dependent X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements at the Au L3-edge, in association with ab initio calculations, show that the local structure and electronic behavior of Au36(SR)24 are of more molecule-like nature, whereas its icosahedral counterparts such as Au38(SR)24 and Au25(SR)18 are more metal-like. Moreover, site-specific S K-edge XAS studies indicate that the bridging motif for Au36(SR)24 has different bonding behavior from the staple motif from Au38(SR)24. Our findings highlight the important role of "pseudo"-Au4 units within the FCC-like Au28 core in interpreting the bonding properties of Au36(SR)24 and suggest that FCC-like structure in gold thiolate nanoclusters should be treated differently from its bulk counterpart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".