MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322734859 · doi:10.1021/mz500445v

σ Phase Formed in Conformationally Asymmetric AB-Type Block Copolymers

2014· article· en· W2322734859 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Xie, Weihua Li, Feng Qiu, An‐Chang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Macro Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhase (matter)AsymmetryCopolymerVolume fractionMaterials scienceChemical physicsHexagonal crystal systemHexagonal phaseBlock (permutation group theory)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysicsPolymerGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability of various spherical phases formed in conformationally asymmetric AB diblock and architecture asymmetric AB m miktoarm block copolymers is investigated using self-consistent field theory. Both the conformational and architecture asymmetries are unified into a parameter of conformationally asymmetric degree, ε. We find that a complex spherical phase, the σ phase, becomes stable and its phase region expands between bcc and hexagonal phases as increasing ε. Only for large conformational asymmetry, for example, ε = 9 (or m = 3), the A15 phase becomes stable in the region between the σ phase and the hexagonal phase and its phase region terminates at the intermediate segregation region. Compared with the σ phase, the A15 phase has more favorable interfacial energy by enabling the formation of larger spherical domains, and therefore, it becomes more stable in the region of more symmetric volume fraction and stronger segregation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations281
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Macro LettersSame topicBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyFrench-language works237,207