MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322900839 · doi:10.1039/b207999m

The multifarious world of transition metal hydrides

2003· review· en· W2322900839 on OpenAlexaff
G. Sean McGrady, Gemma Guilera

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrideChemistryDihydrogen complexHydrogen bondTransition metalCrystallographyLigand (biochemistry)Quantum chemistryMetalComputational chemistryMoleculeCatalysisCrystal structureOrganic chemistrySupramolecular chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal (TM) hydrides display a remarkable range of bonding types, encompassing classical M-H moieties, dihydrogen complexes containing the eta 2-H2 ligand, and trihydrides which display quantum mechanical site exchange. Furthermore, C-H, Si-H and B-H moieties can bind to TM centres in an eta 2-manner, to give sigma-bond complexes with a spectrum of M...H contributions. In addition to these primary bonding modes, TM complexes also indulge in a wide spectrum of hydrogen-bonding interactions, including both M...H-X and the unique type M-H...H-X. This review begins with a historical perspective of the development of TM hydride chemistry, and proceeds to focus on three significant developments of the past two decades: the discovery of sigma-bond and dihydrogen complexes, the involvement of TM hydrides in hydrogen bonding, and the role played by quantum mechanical phenomena in the chemistry and dynamics of TM hydrides. The account concludes with an overview of the inter-relationship between these apparently disparate novel aspects of TM hydride chemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations219
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Society ReviewsSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207