MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322900839 · doi:10.1039/b207999m

The multifarious world of transition metal hydrides

2003· review· en· W2322900839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrideChemistryDihydrogen complexHydrogen bondTransition metalCrystallographyLigand (biochemistry)Quantum chemistryMetalComputational chemistryMoleculeCatalysisCrystal structureOrganic chemistrySupramolecular chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal (TM) hydrides display a remarkable range of bonding types, encompassing classical M-H moieties, dihydrogen complexes containing the eta 2-H2 ligand, and trihydrides which display quantum mechanical site exchange. Furthermore, C-H, Si-H and B-H moieties can bind to TM centres in an eta 2-manner, to give sigma-bond complexes with a spectrum of M...H contributions. In addition to these primary bonding modes, TM complexes also indulge in a wide spectrum of hydrogen-bonding interactions, including both M...H-X and the unique type M-H...H-X. This review begins with a historical perspective of the development of TM hydride chemistry, and proceeds to focus on three significant developments of the past two decades: the discovery of sigma-bond and dihydrogen complexes, the involvement of TM hydrides in hydrogen bonding, and the role played by quantum mechanical phenomena in the chemistry and dynamics of TM hydrides. The account concludes with an overview of the inter-relationship between these apparently disparate novel aspects of TM hydride chemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it