Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transition metal (TM) hydrides display a remarkable range of bonding types, encompassing classical M-H moieties, dihydrogen complexes containing the eta 2-H2 ligand, and trihydrides which display quantum mechanical site exchange. Furthermore, C-H, Si-H and B-H moieties can bind to TM centres in an eta 2-manner, to give sigma-bond complexes with a spectrum of M...H contributions. In addition to these primary bonding modes, TM complexes also indulge in a wide spectrum of hydrogen-bonding interactions, including both M...H-X and the unique type M-H...H-X. This review begins with a historical perspective of the development of TM hydride chemistry, and proceeds to focus on three significant developments of the past two decades: the discovery of sigma-bond and dihydrogen complexes, the involvement of TM hydrides in hydrogen bonding, and the role played by quantum mechanical phenomena in the chemistry and dynamics of TM hydrides. The account concludes with an overview of the inter-relationship between these apparently disparate novel aspects of TM hydride chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".