MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322966705 · doi:10.20381/ruor-19599

Automatically generated lower bounds for search

2004· dissertation· en· W2322966705 on OpenAlexaff
István T. Hernádvölgyi

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicComputer scienceUpper and lower boundsSimple (philosophy)Travelling salesman problemMacroTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heuristic search algorithms (eg. A* and IDA*) with accurate lower bounds can solve impressively large problems optimally. Most lower bounds, such as the well known Manhattan Distance heuristic for the sliding-tile puzzles or the Assignment Problem lower bound for the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman problem, are the products of human ingenuity and insight. An alternative approach to obtain lower bounds is to precalculate shortest distances in an abstraction of the original search space which is derived automatically and store the bounds in pattern databases (look-up tables). This latter technique, based on the ideas of Culberson and Schaeffer, gained popularity when Korf for the first time solved random instances of Rubik's Cube using pattern databases. While researchers were pushing for solving larger and larger problems, the fact that there exist a very large number of abstract spaces that can provide lower bounds was overlooked. This thesis fills this gap in research by investigating the search performance of lower bounds derived from abstractions. We also use the results of this analysis to automatically derive high performance pattern databases. First, we establish a very predictable trade-off between search speed and the number of entries in the pattern database. Second, we derive simple statistics that can predict the search performance of pattern databases without performing actual searches in the original state space. Using these results, we derive high performance pattern databases to search for macro-operators and to solve challenging instances of the well known Sequential Ordering Problem (SOP). Macro-search is a good candidate to showcase automatically derived lower bounds since there are many search spaces and each needs a different lower bound. The SOP is an NP-hard optimization problem. We were able to solve an unsolved instance from the TSPLIB. This required a greedy search in the space of abstractions to find a sufficiently accurate lower bound and several novel enhancements to the basic branch and bound algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207