MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323055338 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-4863

Dynamic soaring surveillance in a gradient wind field

2013· article· en· W2323055338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Environmental scienceMeteorologyRemote sensingComputer scienceAerospace engineeringGeologyEngineeringGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small unmanned aerial vehicles face energy challenges in performing energy-intensive tasks such as surveillance. This paper is inspired by the dynamic soaring strategy to exploit kinetic energy from wind gradients. By incorporating the soaring strategy into the surveillance framework, a dynamic soaring surveillance approach is proposed. In this approach, an energy-efficient trajectory is designed based on a specified Dubins path. At the initial and final points of the trajectory between the neighboring visit, UAV’s total energy (potential and kinetic energy) remains as close as possible. As a result, the UAV can take the advantage of the wind instead of consuming its on-board power to perform the surveillance task. Therefore, the endurance performance may be extended to allow for longer and wider surveillance with a limited on-board power supply. In this paper, the proposed energy-efficient planning algorithm is presented, followed by simulation results to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it