MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323154574 · doi:10.3138/jrpc.10.1.004

“Even a Man Who is Pure in Heart”: Filmic Horror, Popular Religion and the Spectral Underside of History

2005· article· en· W2323154574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religion and Popular Culture · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyCurseHegemonySubalternSociologyAestheticsTheme (computing)AlienationCreaturesPopular cultureMainstreamLiteratureHistoryMedia studiesArtLawPoliticsPolitical scienceAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The popular sectors of society have often been represented as embodying a monstrous curse that promotes passivity with respect to dominant ideological structures. This paper will examine filmic horror and popular religion as perceived locations of ideological manipulation among the subaltern sectors of society. This perceived manipulation has generated moral panics and collective fears about the possibility of people turning into hideous creatures who wreak havoc on themselves and others. Through a critical appraisal of the 1941 horror movie The Wolf Man, this paper will utilize the theme of lycanthropy as a starting-point for probing the “low-end” traditions of popular religion and filmic horror within the writings of theologians, scholars and critics who fear that they promote alienation and re-inscribe hegemony. But is the curse of hegemony as totalizing as it is often described?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it