MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323410056 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2012-0098

Investigation of passive failure and deformation mechanisms due to tunnelling in clay

2013· article· en· W2323410056 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPore water pressureConsolidation (business)GeologyCentrifugeSettlement (finance)Quantum tunnellingDissipationTransverse planeFactor of safetyMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is essential to prevent failures at a tunnel face during tunnel construction to protect existing structures and underground utilities. Many studies have investigated active failure in clay, but passive failure is often overlooked. The objectives of this study are to investigate passive failure as well as surface heave and excess pore-water pressure induced by tunnel face displacement in a geotechnical centrifuge. Long-term settlement and dissipation of excess pore-water pressure after passive failure are also investigated. For a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 2.1, soil in front of the tunnel face is displaced mainly forwards and upwards to the ground surface by the advancing tunnel face. The measured passive failure pressure is closely bounded by the best upper and lower bounds and agrees reasonably well with the cavity expansion solution. For a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 4.2, a localized failure mechanism is observed. There is a large discrepancy between the measured passive failure pressure and the upper bound solution. Both longitudinal and transverse surface heaves for tunnels located at cover to diameter ratios of 2.1 and 4.2 may be described by two-dimensional Gaussian distributions. The spherical cavity expansion solution appears to overestimate excess pore-water pressure upon passive failure for a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 2.1. An average of 90% degree of consolidation is reached at time factors of 0.9 and 1.5 for tunnels located at cover to diameter ratios of 2.1 and 4.2, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it