MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323410056 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2012-0098

Investigation of passive failure and deformation mechanisms due to tunnelling in clay

2013· article· en· W2323410056 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles W.W. Ng, Kam Sing Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPore water pressureConsolidation (business)GeologyCentrifugeSettlement (finance)Quantum tunnellingDissipationTransverse planeFactor of safetyMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is essential to prevent failures at a tunnel face during tunnel construction to protect existing structures and underground utilities. Many studies have investigated active failure in clay, but passive failure is often overlooked. The objectives of this study are to investigate passive failure as well as surface heave and excess pore-water pressure induced by tunnel face displacement in a geotechnical centrifuge. Long-term settlement and dissipation of excess pore-water pressure after passive failure are also investigated. For a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 2.1, soil in front of the tunnel face is displaced mainly forwards and upwards to the ground surface by the advancing tunnel face. The measured passive failure pressure is closely bounded by the best upper and lower bounds and agrees reasonably well with the cavity expansion solution. For a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 4.2, a localized failure mechanism is observed. There is a large discrepancy between the measured passive failure pressure and the upper bound solution. Both longitudinal and transverse surface heaves for tunnels located at cover to diameter ratios of 2.1 and 4.2 may be described by two-dimensional Gaussian distributions. The spherical cavity expansion solution appears to overestimate excess pore-water pressure upon passive failure for a tunnel located at a cover to diameter ratio of 2.1. An average of 90% degree of consolidation is reached at time factors of 0.9 and 1.5 for tunnels located at cover to diameter ratios of 2.1 and 4.2, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207