MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324055883 · doi:10.1061/40971(310)130

Visco-Elastic Portrayal of Bituminous Materials: Artificial Neural Network Approach

2008· article· en· W2324055883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoCongress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkDynamic modulusAsphaltModulusComputer scienceAsphalt concreteTest dataMaterials scienceDynamic mechanical analysisMachine learningComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a scheme to circumvent the need for extensive laboratory testing to determine the dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete materials. It calls for using existing complex modulus test results and applying an analytical tool to expand this data. This study presents the artificial neural network (ANN) technique as a promising method that can help designers have a good estimation of the dynamic modulus based on data accumulated over the years. The study highlights the use of ANN method, which utilizes simple physical parameters as input, to predict the dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete. Results of ANN simulations showed the ability of the ANN technique to predict the dynamic modulus of mixes prepared to different air voids and with different gradations and binders. Such a tool represents an attractive alternative to testing for small jurisdictions with limited budget and personnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it