MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324447241 · doi:10.12943/anr.2012.00017

Monte Carlo Calculations Applied to SLOWPOKE Full-Reactor Analysis

2012· article· en· W2324447241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueAECL Nuclear Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnupNuclear engineeringMonte Carlo methodEnriched uraniumNeutron transportCore (optical fiber)Nuclear dataUraniumReactivity (psychology)Materials scienceNuclear physicsRadiochemistryChemistryNeutronPhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monte Carlo simulations are applied to the full-reactor analysis of the SLOWPOKE design. The temperature reactivity feedback calculated by using the MCNP code for either the high enriched uranium (HEU) or low enriched uranium (LEU) core is in good agreement with the experimental data, with a k-eff bias of +3.3 mk for a HEU core and +6 mk for a LEU core. Two methods that are based on existing third-party codes have been developed for use in core following: 1) MCNP (for the transport calculation) in conjunction with WIMS-AECL (for fuel burnup advancement), and 2) SERPENT (that combines both transport and burnup capabilities). Both methods show very good agreement with the experimental data for core excess reactivity and detailed power distributions versus burnup and reactivity shim.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it