MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324765073 · doi:10.1021/ef201853k

Detailed Multi-dimensional Study of Pollutant Formation in a Methane Diffusion Flame

2012· article· en· W2324765073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsRolls-Royce (Canada)
FundersPolitecnico di MilanoSandia National LaboratoriesIrish Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsMethanePollutantDiffusionDiffusion flameEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCombustionThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryCombustorEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a method to produce chemical reactor networks (CRNs) consisting of large numbers of perfectly stirred reactors (PSRs) from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to predict pollutant emissions from combustion systems accurately, flexibly, and efficiently using detailed kinetic schemes and the kinetic post-processor (KPP) developed at Politecnico di Milano. Benefits of the method described here include its applicability to a wide range of combustion systems, its ability to predict emissions of a variety of pollutant species, and its speed. CFD and CFD–CRN simulation results of the Sandia D piloted methane–air diffusion round-jet flame are successfully validated against experimental data for axial velocity, mixture fraction, temperature, and speciation, including CO and NO mass fractions. A CRN consisting of a large number of PSRs is found to be required to simulate the system accurately, while ensuring independence of the solution from CRN size. The results of CFD–CRN analysis for a 1114 PSR network are used to study the pathways (thermal, prompt, N 2 O, and NO 2 ) by which NO and NO 2, the constituents of NO x, are formed in the flame. Results of CFD–CRN analysis show that NO is produced in the high-temperature ( T > 1850 K) flame brush by a combination of the prompt, N 2 O, and thermal pathways and in the intermediate-temperature (1000 < T < 1600 K) post-flame region by a reversal of the NO 2 pathway. NO is consumed in the fuel-rich (mixture fraction, f > 0.43) region, where a low O atom concentration encourages a reversal of the prompt pathway (i.e., NO reburning), and in low-temperature ( T < 1000 K) regions by the NO 2 pathway, which oxidizes NO to NO 2 . Rate of production analysis, performed using CHEMKIN PRO at specified locations throughout the flame, shows that the trends of NO production and consumption observed in these simulations agree with expected and published results. Finally, the study predicts that, of the total NO x produced by the Sandia D flame, 47% is due to the prompt pathway, 32% is due to the N 2 O pathway, and 21% is due to the thermal pathway. As future steps in this work, the CFD–CRN method will be adapted and used to predict and study emissions from a range of more complex combustion systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it