MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325166340 · doi:10.1021/jp205502d

Size-Dependent Electron Transfer and Trapping in Strongly Luminescent Colloidal Gallium Oxide Nanocrystals

2011· article· en· W2325166340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceNanocrystalAcceptorMaterials scienceGalliumOxideLuminescenceBinding energyChemical physicsNanotechnologyPhotochemistryChemistryOptoelectronicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the mechanisms of defect-related photoluminescence in colloidal transparent conducting oxide nanocrystals is important for the development of new multifunctional nanostructures and devices. Here we report a study of the role of NC size, structure, defects, and surface capping on the photoluminescence energy, efficiency, and dynamics of colloidal γ-Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals. A strong blue emission (quantum yield ∼25%) is associated with the presence of the vacancy-defect sites, and assigned to the donor–acceptor pair (DAP) recombination. The emission energy and lifetime are generally determined by the donor and acceptor binding energies (which are dependent on the NC structure) and the attractive Coulombic interactions between charged donor and acceptor sites (which are dependent on the defect concentration). Variable temperature photoluminescence measurements reveal that binding energies of the donor and acceptor levels are also size-dependent; in 6.0 ± 1.0 nm γ-Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals donor binding energy was determined to be 205 meV, increasing by ca. 30 meV in 3.3 ± 0.5 nm nanocrystals. The defect sites on nanocrystal surfaces (OH – or O 2– ) also influence DAP recombination by trapping photogenerated valence band holes. Removal of the surface defect sites by capping ligands (dodecylamine and tri- n -octylphosphine oxide) is shown to eliminate this hole-trapping pathway, enhancing a hole capture by the acceptor sites, and increasing the DAP emission intensity. The results of the mechanistic study of the DAP recombination in this work serve as a useful guideline for introducing and manipulating PL properties in oxide nanostructures by controlling the native defect interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it