MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325726418 · doi:10.1190/tle32030338.1

Student Zone

2013· article· en· W2325726418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeninsulaField tripMillerDrillGeological surveyGeologyFoundation (evidence)ArchaeologyOil shaleTRIPS architectureGeographyHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringGeophysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In June 2010 and November 2010, members of SEG's University of Toronto Student Chapter organized geo-physical field trips, sponsored by the SEG Foundation, to Miller Lake on the Bruce Peninsula, 300 km north of Toronto. Figure 1 shows the location of the peninsula and Miller Lake within southern Ontario. The field trip had three main objectives: To teach students the basics of geophysical field work and familiarize them with various geophysical survey methods; to determine the depth to the water table to help the landowner decide where to drill a well for drinking water; and to detect the presence of any shale layers, some of which may be saturated with saline water and thus to be avoided (a particular problem in the area).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it