Interstudy and Intrastudy Temporal Trends of Polychlorinated Biphenyl, Pesticide, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Air and Precipitation at a Rural Site in Ontario
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), organochlorine pesticide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentrations were measured in air (in the vapor and particle phases) and in precipitation samples collected at Point Petre on the northeastern shore of Lake Ontario as a part of the Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network. These data were measured in two separate studies, one running from 1992 to 2003 (inclusive) and the other from 1998 to 2011 (inclusive). Having these two independent studies is a direct way of measuring changes in atmospheric concentrations and comparing interstudy changes to intrastudy changes. The concentrations of almost all pesticides declined between the two studies with halving times of 3–6 years; the concentrations of PAHs and PCBs did not change much between the two studies. This suggests that there are continuing sources of PAHs and PCBs to the Great Lakes atmosphere. PAH concentrations were elevated in the winter when space heating consumes greater amounts of fuel and emits larger amounts of PAHs. Pesticide and PCB concentrations were elevated in the summer because of enhanced volatilization from terrestrial or aquatic surfaces during hot summer days. Although there were a few exceptions (notably lindane), in general, the data from the two study periods gave similar results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it