MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326090653 · doi:10.2514/6.2007-4333

A parallel Newton-Krylov flow solver for the Euler equations on multi-block grids

2007· article· en· W2326090653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPreconditionerKrylov subspaceMathematicsDiscretizationApplied mathematicsBackward Euler methodEuler equationsIterative methodSolverNewton's methodLinear systemEuler's formulaMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a parallel Newton-Krylov algorithm for solving the three-dimensional Euler equations on multi-block structured meshes. The Euler equations are discretized on each block independently using second-order accurate summation-by-parts operators and scalar numerical dissipation. Boundary conditions are imposed and block interfaces are coupled using simultaneous approximation terms (SATs). The resulting discrete equations are solved iteratively using an inexact Newton method. At each Newton iteration, the linear system is solved inexactly using a Krylov subspace iterative method, and both additive Schwarz and approximate Schur preconditioners are considered. The algorithm is tested on the ONERA M6 wing. The results show that a discretization based on SATs is well suited to a parallel Newton-Krylov solution strategy, and that the approximate Schur preconditioner is more efficient than the Schwarz preconditioner in terms of CPU time and Krylov iterations, for both flow and adjoint solves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it