A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Abstract
In 1990, Elinor Ostrom proposed eight design principles, positing them to characterize robust institutions for managing common-pool resources such as forests or fisheries. Since then, many studies have explicitly or implicitly evaluated these design principles. We analyzed 91 such studies to evaluate the principles empirically and to consider what theoretical issues have arisen since their introduction. We found that the principles are well supported empirically and that several important theoretical issues warrant discussion. We provide a reformulation of the design principles, drawing from commonalities found in the studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Topic
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Field
- Environmental Science
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- Fundación Caja MadridLincoln Institute of Land PolicyNational Science Foundation
- Keywords
- Natural resource managementEnvironmental resource managementNatural resourceCommunity-based managementNatural (archaeology)Ecosystem managementEnvironmental planningResource (disambiguation)Computer scienceBusinessGeographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyEcosystemBiology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes