MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326416640 · doi:10.1021/jp403350j

Role of Humidity and Oxygen Level on Damage to DNA Induced by Soft X-rays and Low-Energy Electrons

2013· article· en· W2326416640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsElectronHumidityOxygenMaterials scienceDNASoft X-raysAtomic physicsRadiochemistryPhysicsNuclear physicsChemistryOpticsMeteorologyLaserBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single- and double-strand breaks induced by soft X-rays (1.5 keV) and photoemitted low-energy electrons (LEEs) (0–30 eV) were measured in dry and humid thin films of plasmid DNA irradiated under different controllable levels of oxygen at standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP). G values derived from these experiments show that the presence of H 2 O and changing the atmosphere from N 2 to O 2, while keeping all other experimental parameters constant, increases the formation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by factors of 4.5 and 11.8 for X-rays and LEEs, respectively. Under an oxygenated environment in humid DNA films, the additional LEE-induced damage resulting from the combination of water and oxygen exhibits a super-additive effect, which leads to the formation of DSBs with a G value almost 7 times higher than that obtained by X-ray photons. These results indicate that O 2, H 2 O, and LEEs effectively contribute synergistically to enhance the formation of DSBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it