MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327048247 · doi:10.1190/segam2012-1438.1

3D inversion of DC/IP data using adaptive OcTree meshes

2012· article· en· W2327048247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshOctreeComputer scienceInversion (geology)Computer graphics (images)Computational scienceComputer visionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data acquired from a direct current (DC) and induced polarization (IP) survey can be used to recover the conductivity and chargeability structures of the subsurface of the earth. In order to maximize the value of such a survey, the data should be inverted in 3D. As surveys get larger and targets get more complex, the discretization applied in regular rectilinear meshes can become cumbersome, resulting in prohibitively large numbers of cells. This problem is exacerbated in the presence of severe topography, or in cases of irregular survey geometry. Applying an adaptive OcTree mesh structure, it is possible to obtain fine resolution cells in regions of high variability without adding unnecessarily small cells where they are not required. This results in a vastly decreased number of cells, without penalizing the potential for high resolution recovered models. We develop the DC/IP inverse algorithm on the Oc-Tree mesh, and apply it to a field example from South America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it