MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327781871 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-5231

Kinodynamic Motion Planning for UAVs: A Minimum Energy Approach

2013· article· en· W2327781871 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Motion planningComputer scienceRobotTrajectoryHeuristicMathematical optimizationMobile robotMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an optimal kinodynamic rapidly exploring random tree, a single query incremental sampling based optimal motion planner for robots with non-linear dynamics, differential constraints and actuation limitations. Our work extends the algorithms presented previously by formulating a fixed-final-state-free-final-time open loop configuration space metric for nearest neighbours search and the appropriate closed loop feedback controller for the tree extension heuristic, allowing us to introduce constraints on actuation magnitude and bandwidth. The controller is formulated by minimizing the amount of energy used to connect two states whereas the trade off is between total trajectory time and weighted actuation norm. We demonstrate the algorithm on (1) a simple 2D pendulum with actuation constraints and (2) a quad rotor 13D model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it