MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328576291 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/9/3536

Sinogram denoising via simultaneous sparse representation in learned dictionaries

2016· article· en· W2328576291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsNoise reductionSparse approximationArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePixelProjection (relational algebra)Noise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Cluster analysisNon-local meansImage (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer visionImage denoising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing the radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) is highly desirable but it leads to excessive noise in the projection measurements. This can significantly reduce the diagnostic value of the reconstructed images. Removing the noise in the projection measurements is, therefore, essential for reconstructing high-quality images, especially in low-dose CT. In recent years, two new classes of patch-based denoising algorithms proved superior to other methods in various denoising applications. The first class is based on sparse representation of image patches in a learned dictionary. The second class is based on the non-local means method. Here, the image is searched for similar patches and the patches are processed together to find their denoised estimates. In this paper, we propose a novel denoising algorithm for cone-beam CT projections. The proposed method has similarities to both these algorithmic classes but is more effective and much faster. In order to exploit both the correlation between neighboring pixels within a projection and the correlation between pixels in neighboring projections, the proposed algorithm stacks noisy cone-beam projections together to form a 3D image and extracts small overlapping 3D blocks from this 3D image for processing. We propose a fast algorithm for clustering all extracted blocks. The central assumption in the proposed algorithm is that all blocks in a cluster have a joint-sparse representation in a well-designed dictionary. We describe algorithms for learning such a dictionary and for denoising a set of projections using this dictionary. We apply the proposed algorithm on simulated and real data and compare it with three other algorithms. Our results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms some of the best denoising algorithms, while also being much faster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it