MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328997034 · doi:10.1080/03601277.2012.660868

Change in Beliefs about Older Drivers through Applied Theater

2012· article· en· W2328997034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Gerontology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAttitude changeSocial changeBehavior changeOlder peopleSocial psychologyApplied psychologyGerontologyMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the highly-complex and emotionally-charged nature of issues concerning older drivers, we engaged in the development and evaluation of a research-based applied theater production. A quasiexperimental pretest–posttest group design was used to assess change in attitudes and beliefs, derived from social science theories, of older drivers and other stakeholders. After viewing the play, older adults showed decreases in their positive attitudes toward driving and intention to continuing driving. The findings for the older adults appeared to be driven by the responses of the women in the group. Stakeholders showed no change in attitudes about older drivers. Data collected two weeks after the play was viewed confirmed that audience members found the play informative and that it promoted discussion about the topic. The findings from this study provide important new information about how exposure to an applied theater production brings about attitude change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it