Seismic Design and Performance of High-Rise Steel Buildings under Various International Design Codes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increase in the number of seismic events and their devastations in the recent past has assisted in many developments in seismic codes of various international standards. Codes adopt conventional elastic methods in the design of structures to estimate the strength and deformation demand employing seismic design factors to represent the nonlinear behavior of the structure. Four typical high-rise steel buildings of 8, 12, 16 and 20 stories are designed and detailed using various seismic codes. Seismic response of the reference buildings is assessed with detailed fiber-based models using inelastic pushover and incremental dynamic analyses subject to 20 strong seismic records. The proposed study provides comparisons between different seismic design codes for the range of the reference buildings at different performance levels. This study may help the designers in optimizing their design in the seismic regions and provide an insight to assess the seismic performance and predict the behavior at different performance levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it