A generalized projective dynamic for solving extreme and interior eigenvalue problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In [18] (Golub and Liao), a continuous-time system which is based on the projective dynamic is proposed to solve some concave optimization problems (with the unit ball constraint) resulted from extreme and interior eigenvalue problems. The convergence inside the unit ball is established; however, neither further convergence result outside the unit ball nor the stability analysis is available. Moreover, preliminary numerical experience indicates that this method is sensitive to a parameter whose optimal value is still difficult to determine. After analyzing the stability of this dynamic, in this paper, we develop a generalized model and analyze the convergence of the new model both inside and outside the unit ball. The flow of the generalized model is proved to converge almost globally to some eigenvector corresponding to the smallest eigenvalue, and share many surprisingly analogous properties with the Rayleigh quotient gradient flow. Links of our generalized projective dynamical system with other related works are also discussed. The efficiency of our new model is both addressed in theory and verified in numerical testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it