MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329845971 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.747

Global Hopf branches and multiple limit cycles in a delayed Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model

2014· article· en· W2329845971 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLimit (mathematics)Bounded functionHopf bifurcationStability (learning theory)PredationLimit cycleApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisNonlinear systemComputer sciencePhysicsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent studies, global Hopf branches were investigated fordelayed model of HTLV-I infection with delay-independent parameters.It is shown in [8,9] that when stability switches occur,global Hopf branches tend to be bounded, and different branches canoverlap to produce coexistence of stable periodic solutions. In thispaper, we investigate global Hopf branches for delayed systems withdelay-dependent parameters. Using a delayed predator-prey model asan example, we demonstrate that stability switches caused by varyingthe time delay are accompanied by bounded global Hopf branches. Whenmultiple Hopf branches exist, they are nested and the overlapproduces coexistence of two or possibly more stable limit cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it