MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330020580 · doi:10.1115/ipc2010-31646

Statistical Predictive Modelling: A Methodology to Prioritize Site Selection for Near-Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking

2010· article· en· W2330020580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingIntegrity managementPipeline transportCrackingCorrosionReliability engineeringProbabilistic logicReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceStress (linguistics)Pipeline (software)Ultimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceWeldingStatistical powerStructural engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMetallurgyStatisticsComposite materialMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipelines are subjected to both residual and applied tensile stresses, and can form near-neutral pH SCC (transgranular stress corrosion cracking) if the pipeline is exposed to a conducive environment and is made from a material that is susceptible to SCC. This transgranular SCC is an ongoing integrity concern for pipeline operators. As part of an SCC Integrity Management Program (IMP), it is necessary to perform integrity assessments and prioritize segments of the pipelines to manage the SCC threat. Ultrasonic crack detection in-line inspection tools have proven capable of locating SCC, but reliability of these tools is not absolute and the reduced probability of detection of subcritical flaws limits options for proactive management. Hydrostatic retesting is a very effective program for removing near-critical axial defects, such as SCC, but does not provide useful information as to the location of SCC along the pipeline. NACE Standard RP0204-2004 (SCC Direct Assessment Methodology or SCCDA) outlines factors to consider and methodologies to employ to predict where the SCC is likely to occur, but the standard acknowledges that there are no well-established methods for predicting the presence of SCC with a high degree of certainty. The trend in probabilistic modelling has been to focus on establishing deterministic relationships between environmental factors, tensile stress and SCC formation, and growth; these models have achieved varying degrees of success. The Statistical Predictive Model (SPM) was previously developed to predict the likelihood of occurrence of near-neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) for the NPS 10 Alberta Products Pipeline (APPL). SPM Phase 5 uses selected predictor variables representing tensile stress, environmental, pipe-related, corrosion control and operational relevant factors to determine the Probability of Occurrence of SCC. Regression techniques were used to create multi-variable logistic regression models. The results for each model are checked at locations where SCC is known to be present or absent to assess predictive accuracy, then used to prioritize susceptible segments for field excavation. The relative strength of individual predictor variables provides insight into the mechanism of near-neutral pH SCC crack initiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it