MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330215087 · doi:10.1021/op4000847

Improving the Industrial Feasibility of Metal-Free Hydrogenation Catalysts Using Chemical Scavengers

2013· article· en· W2330215087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoGreenCentre Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryImineYield (engineering)MetalOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified process using inexpensive poison scavengers has been developed that allows for more economical and practical scale-up of metal-free catalytic hydrogenation. The scavengers remove impurities such as water and aldehydes that can hinder catalysis allowing for the use of commercial-grade solvents, substrates and gases. In addition, the scavengers have the unique ability to regenerate poisoned catalysts, allowing for increased turnover numbers and longer catalyst lifetimes. Hydrogenations of unpurified imine substrates proceed with high yield using a variety of metal-free hydrogenation catalysts, demonstrating the general compatibility of this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it