MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330215087 · doi:10.1021/op4000847

Improving the Industrial Feasibility of Metal-Free Hydrogenation Catalysts Using Chemical Scavengers

2013· article· en· W2330215087 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordan W. Thomson, Jillian A. Hatnean, Jeff Hastie, Andrew Pasternak, Douglas W. Stephan, P.A. Chase

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoGreenCentre Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryImineYield (engineering)MetalOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified process using inexpensive poison scavengers has been developed that allows for more economical and practical scale-up of metal-free catalytic hydrogenation. The scavengers remove impurities such as water and aldehydes that can hinder catalysis allowing for the use of commercial-grade solvents, substrates and gases. In addition, the scavengers have the unique ability to regenerate poisoned catalysts, allowing for increased turnover numbers and longer catalyst lifetimes. Hydrogenations of unpurified imine substrates proceed with high yield using a variety of metal-free hydrogenation catalysts, demonstrating the general compatibility of this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic Process Research & DevelopmentSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207