MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330428782 · doi:10.1021/ar2003144

Selective Localization of Preformed Nanoparticles in Morphologically Controllable Block Copolymer Aggregates in Solution

2012· article· en· W2330428782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleCopolymerNanoparticleMaterials sciencePolymersomeAmphiphilePolymerContext (archaeology)Self-assemblyVesicleNanotechnologyTemplateNanostructureChemical engineeringSolventAqueous solutionChemistryOrganic chemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of nanodevices currently requires the formation of morphologically controlled or highly ordered arrays of metal, semiconducting, or magnetic nanoparticles. In this context, polymer self-assembly provides a powerful bottom-up approach for constructing these materials. The self-assembly of block copolymers (BCPs) in solution is a facile and popular method for the preparation of aggregates of controllable morphologies, including spherical micelles, cylindrical micelles, vesicles (or polymersomes), thin films, and other complex structures that range from zero to three dimensions. Researchers can generally control the morphology of the aggregates by varying copolymer composition or environmental parameters, including the copolymer concentration, the common solvent, the content of the precipitant, or the presence of additives such as ions, among others. For example, as the content of the hydrophilic block in amphiphilic copolymers decreases, the aggregates formed from the copolymers can change from spherical micelles to cylindrical micelles and to vesicles. The aggregates of various morphologies provide excellent templates for the organization of the nanoparticles. The presence of various domains, such as cores, interfaces, and coronas, in BCP aggregates allows for selective localization of nanoparticles in different regions, which may critically affect the resulting properties and applications of the nanoparticles. For example, the incorporation of quantum dots (QDs) into micelle cores solves many problems encountered in the utilization of QDs in biological environments, including enhancement of water solubility, aggregation prevention, increases in circulation or retention time, and toxicity clearance. Simultaneously it preserves the unique optical performance of QDs compared with those of organic fluorophores, such as size-tunable light emission, improved signal brightness, resistance against photobleaching, and simultaneous excitation of multiple fluorescence colors. Therefore, many studies have focused on the selective localization of nanoparticles in BCP aggregates. This Account describes the selective localization of preformed spherical nanoparticles in different domains of BCP aggregates of controllable morphologies in solution, including spherical micelles, cylindrical micelles, and vesicles. These structures offer many potential applications in biotechnology, biomedicine, catalysis, etc. We also introduce other types of control, including interparticle spacing, particle number density, or aggregate size control. We highlight examples in which the surface coating, volume fraction, or size of the particles was tailored to precisely control incorporation. These examples build on the thermodynamic considerations of particle-polymer interactions, such as hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, and ligand replacement, among others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it