The Effects of Incremental Corner Modifications on a 200m Tall Building
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of corner modifications on the wind loading and responses of tall buildings has been investigated on many occasions. Different studies have observed how the overall building response varies with the inclusion of corner cuts, chamfers, venting, and fins. However, in general only two basic cases have been considered, namely with and without every corner modified. Many structures can benefit from certain modifications, but the relationship between the location of the modification and its resulting effect relative to the predominant wind direction has not been developed. The current work explores the influence of incremental corner chamfers to the mean and dynamic response of a nominally square building. Wind tunnel tests were carried out for suburban exposure and corner chamfers with dimensions of 1/10 and 1/6.7 of the building face. Decreases in mean loading were apparent through the comparison of base bending and torsion moment coefficients. Examination of the along-wind and across-wind spectra show that the impact of corner chamfers can shift or reduce the spectral peak for particular angles, which can result in reduced dynamic response depending on the structural properties of the building. Acceleration levels for an idealized building are compared for each corner configuration. The influence of wind directionality on the acceleration levels of the idealized building are also discussed using two different wind climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it