MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330854437 · doi:10.1093/notesj/gjs290

An Annotated Wordbook of The Beggar's Opera (1728)

2013· article· en· W2330854437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes and Queries · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperaArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hitherto unreported wordbook of the original production of John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera (1728) is housed in the Rare Books and Special Collections library at McGill University as part of a seventy-five volume collection of English plays largely assembled by the antiquary Adam de Cardonnel-Lawson (1746/7–1820) (some plays have his signature on the title page). The plays begin with one from 1654 and then beginning in 1711 run through 1823 for some 480 plays in all. Most volumes have contemporary clippings and manuscript comments added; many of the later clippings concern performances in Bath where Cardonnel-Lawson lived in the years before his death. The volumes have the armorial bookplate of Sir John Cam Hobhouse (1786–1868). McGill University Library acquired the collection in May 1921 from the Bath bookseller George Gregory. Two editions of The Beggar’s Opera, both with the overture and music for the songs, are present in this collection. A copy of the fifth edition (1742) appears as the second item in volume 23. The manuscript text reproduced here is from a copy of the second edition (1728) (shelf mark PR1269 H63 v.39 #4) and it appears on a single sheet of laid paper bound before the printed text:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it