MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331527390 · doi:10.5171/2013.999612

Knowledge Transfer for Sustainable Innovation: A Model for Academic-Industry Interaction to Improve Resource Efficiency within SME Manufacturers

2013· article· en· W2331527390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Innovation Management in Small and Medium Enterprises · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Industrial Ecology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessResource efficiencySustainabilityResource (disambiguation)Knowledge transferAbsorptive capacityKnowledge managementCentralityIndustrial organizationNatural resourceMarketingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental threats associated with demographic and technological trends have resulted in calls for transition to a global economy that operates within the carrying capacity of the natural environment. Because of their centrality to economic activity, this transition must include small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). At the same time, because of their role as knowledge holders on both sustainability and business, higher education institutions (HEIs) can play a more active role in supporting SMEs to address this transition through the provision of timely and appropriate information. Dalhousie University's Eco-Efficiency Centre (EEC) works with SMEs to support them to identify opportunities to pursue sustainability through improved resource (material and energy) efficiency. To date, much of the support for improved resource efficiency within business has focused large corporations; it has not addressed the particular characteristics of SMEs. Supporting that transition needs a different approach, one that understands SMEs' learning dynamics; i.e. their drivers and motivators to apply new knowledge as part of their internal strategies. This paper will discuss one approach taken that focused specifically on developing the absorptive capacity of SMEs to incorporate innovationwhere in this case 'innovation' reflects the strategies for improved resource efficiency. By investigating the relationships and impacts of the EECs involvement with 70 SME manufacturers through their Eco-Efficiency Program for Manufacturers this paper looks at the development of a localized 'knowledge creation and transfer system'. By acting as an interlocutor within this system, they successfully promoted the transfer and integration of resource efficiency knowledge within the sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it