MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331739436 · doi:10.2514/6.2012-15190

AIM Microsatellite Platform: A Canadian Multi-Mission Satellite Bus Solution

2012· article· en· W2331739436 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jeffrey S Cain, Franz Newland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
FundersUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TorontoDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsSatelliteComputer scienceSatellite broadcastingRemote sensingAeronauticsAerospace engineeringEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past four years, COM DEV has been developing the AIM (Advanced Integrated Microsatellite) satellite bus in order to address missions and user applications that can be met by a spacecraft in the 100 kg class. AIM will serve as a platform for both research and operational missions with a design that meets or exceeds the Canadian Space Agency Multi-Mission Microsatellite Bus (MMMB) requirements and has further enhancements targeted towards increasing its operational utility. A key feature of the AIM bus is the ability to accommodate various mission requirements with a flexible, modular design that distinctly separates the payload module from the bus module. The “open box” structure of the AIM bus maximizes the available mounting area for payloads and subsystems, and also allows easy access for assembly, integration and testing. The platform has an A-side/B-side configuration providing a single-fault tolerant architecture. The AIM bus has been selected as the platform for M3MSat (Maritime Monitoring and Messaging Microsatellite), a joint mission of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC), and is being considered for use in a number of other missions, including the QEYSSat mission. The bus is the result of a joint collaboration between COM DEV Ltd. and the University of Toronto Institute of Aerospace Studies/Space Flight Laboratory (UTIAS/SFL). This paper describes the satellite bus and design and touches upon the ongoing M3MSat development as well as potential future missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207